The Economist: "BBC blows $152 million on failed content management system "

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

The Economist: "BBC blows $152 million on failed content management system "

Glen Newton
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Economist: "BBC blows $152 million on failed content management system "

James McKinney-2
What's the relation to open government/open data?

On 2013-06-13, at 12:31 PM, Glen Newton wrote:

> http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/06/bbcs-hi-tech-failure
>
> -Glen
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss

_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Economist: "BBC blows $152 million on failed content management system "

Glen Newton
The BBC is a UK government organization, like the CBC.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:11 PM, James McKinney <[hidden email]> wrote:

> What's the relation to open government/open data?
>
> On 2013-06-13, at 12:31 PM, Glen Newton wrote:
>
>> http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/06/bbcs-hi-tech-failure
>>
>> -Glen
>> _______________________________________________
>> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss



--
-
http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/
-
_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Economist: "BBC blows $152 million on failed content management system "

James McKinney-2
Are you saying any reports of government waste are on topic?

On 2013-06-13, at 2:04 PM, Glen Newton wrote:

> The BBC is a UK government organization, like the CBC.
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:11 PM, James McKinney <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> What's the relation to open government/open data?
>>
>> On 2013-06-13, at 12:31 PM, Glen Newton wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/06/bbcs-hi-tech-failure
>>>
>>> -Glen
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> -
> http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/
> -
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss

_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [OTT-GOSLING] The Economist: "BBC blows $152 million on failed content management system "

Russell McOrmond
In reply to this post by Glen Newton

On 13-06-13 10:28 PM, Joseph Potvin wrote:
> Not hard to understand...
> http://www.opentext.com/2/global/company/news/press-releases/press-release-details.htm?id=2034

  Sad that there is often a "Canadian" link to these types of failed
technology projects.

  Funny --- the LAM community created charity Milan and I work
(Canadiana) for has been mis-characterized in the news this week as
being a "private high-tech consortium" trying to lock away Canada's
heritage.    While you need to go to ACTA/TPP/etc for that type of
backward-facing policy, I seem to remember rumors that there was a
person previously involved in similar (digitization, preservation,
access) projects who believed that they needed to partner with OpenText
for these types of projects.  That type of thinking might have lead to
the oddball headlines from this week being more true of that project if
it had gone forward.

Note: In case anyone didn't see it
http://mcormond.blogspot.ca/2013/06/good-new-canadiana-lac-project-spun.html
pokes fun at some of the poor CBC and Ottawa Citizen coverage of the
project this week.  The "journalist" at the Ottawa Citizen couldn't even
fact-check that Canadiana.COM was a domain-for-sale and not related to
his story.


  Even though the BBC is foreign, there are similar problems here with
government departments, public broadcasters, and publicly funded open-*
projects who make similar administrative mistakes in choosing poor
technology partners.  It isn't like the failure we saw in the 2003
Auditor Generals report (Secure Channel & Entrust that time) was unique
-- and we saw how little attention these serious problems get compared
to lesser lost money (sponsorship "scandal") which can be more easily
labeled as partisan.


--
 Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
 Please help us tell the Canadian Parliament to protect our property
 rights as owners of Information Technology. Sign the petition!
 http://l.c11.ca/ict

 "The government, lobbied by legacy copyright holders and hardware
  manufacturers, can pry my camcorder, computer, home theatre, or
  portable media player from my cold dead hands!"
_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss