http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/06/bbcs-hi-tech-failure
-Glen _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
What's the relation to open government/open data?
On 2013-06-13, at 12:31 PM, Glen Newton wrote: > http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/06/bbcs-hi-tech-failure > > -Glen > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
The BBC is a UK government organization, like the CBC.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:11 PM, James McKinney <[hidden email]> wrote: > What's the relation to open government/open data? > > On 2013-06-13, at 12:31 PM, Glen Newton wrote: > >> http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/06/bbcs-hi-tech-failure >> >> -Glen >> _______________________________________________ >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss -- - http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ - _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
Are you saying any reports of government waste are on topic?
On 2013-06-13, at 2:04 PM, Glen Newton wrote: > The BBC is a UK government organization, like the CBC. > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:11 PM, James McKinney <[hidden email]> wrote: >> What's the relation to open government/open data? >> >> On 2013-06-13, at 12:31 PM, Glen Newton wrote: >> >>> http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/06/bbcs-hi-tech-failure >>> >>> -Glen >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > > > -- > - > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ > - > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
In reply to this post by Glen Newton
On 13-06-13 10:28 PM, Joseph Potvin wrote: > Not hard to understand... > http://www.opentext.com/2/global/company/news/press-releases/press-release-details.htm?id=2034 Sad that there is often a "Canadian" link to these types of failed technology projects. Funny --- the LAM community created charity Milan and I work (Canadiana) for has been mis-characterized in the news this week as being a "private high-tech consortium" trying to lock away Canada's heritage. While you need to go to ACTA/TPP/etc for that type of backward-facing policy, I seem to remember rumors that there was a person previously involved in similar (digitization, preservation, access) projects who believed that they needed to partner with OpenText for these types of projects. That type of thinking might have lead to the oddball headlines from this week being more true of that project if it had gone forward. Note: In case anyone didn't see it http://mcormond.blogspot.ca/2013/06/good-new-canadiana-lac-project-spun.html pokes fun at some of the poor CBC and Ottawa Citizen coverage of the project this week. The "journalist" at the Ottawa Citizen couldn't even fact-check that Canadiana.COM was a domain-for-sale and not related to his story. Even though the BBC is foreign, there are similar problems here with government departments, public broadcasters, and publicly funded open-* projects who make similar administrative mistakes in choosing poor technology partners. It isn't like the failure we saw in the 2003 Auditor Generals report (Secure Channel & Entrust that time) was unique -- and we saw how little attention these serious problems get compared to lesser lost money (sponsorship "scandal") which can be more easily labeled as partisan. -- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/> Please help us tell the Canadian Parliament to protect our property rights as owners of Information Technology. Sign the petition! http://l.c11.ca/ict "The government, lobbied by legacy copyright holders and hardware manufacturers, can pry my camcorder, computer, home theatre, or portable media player from my cold dead hands!" _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |