On 2011-02-02, at 11:58 AM, [hidden email] wrote: > Send CivicAccess-discuss mailing list submissions to > [hidden email] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [hidden email] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [hidden email] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CivicAccess-discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Civil servants forge ahead with open data strategy as > feds dither (Sam Vekemans) > 2. Re: Civil servants forge ahead with open data strategy as > feds dither (Glen Newton) > 3. Re: Civil servants forge ahead with open data strategy as > feds dither (Sam Vekemans) > 4. Re: Civil servants forge ahead with open data strategy as > feds dither (Glen Newton) > 5. Permanent access to public records: "Dutch archives sign > agreement for digital shared services organization" (Glen Newton) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:45:07 -0800 > From: Sam Vekemans <[hidden email]> > To: civicaccess discuss <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [CivicAccess-discuss] Civil servants forge ahead with > open data strategy as feds dither > Message-ID: > <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > oops, > You said 'provenance', so yes, i'll put in direct url links to the > source (like i have done on koordinates.com) > > For now, it's also on a spreadsheet form. > > > cheers, > Sam > > On 2/2/11, Sam Vekemans <[hidden email]> wrote: >> All provinces, and a variety of the CanVec Themes/Features got >> converted. (i don't yet have an exact # yet). >> >> >> Thanks, >> I'll take a look at that site and get links ready for it. >> >> My temporary home is on mediafire.com (but it's a hassel for anyone to >> get to and fast download) >> Archive.org is another option, but it does not allow for updating on >> the files (like an ftp server). >> >> >> cheers, >> Sam >> >> On 2/2/11, Tracey P. Lauriault <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi Sam; >>> >>> I may have a home here (https://communitydata-donneescommunautaires.ca) >>> for >>> them? Can you tell me the provenance for these files? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Tracey >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Sam Vekemans >>> <[hidden email]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tracey, >>>> Who is it that I need to contact where i can share what i have? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have taken the canvec national/provincial .gml files, and converted >>>> many of the national/provincial data layers, and converted it into >>>> commonly known .shp .osm .gpx .kml and garmin .img format. >>>> >>>> >>>> This produced work is freely available with unrestricted use. Is >>>> their a home for this? >>>> (I have been in direct contact with Natural Resources Canada, and they >>>> have assured me that they do not plan on making national/provincial >>>> .shp files of canvec data anytime soon) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sam >>>> >>>> On 2/2/11, Tracey P. Lauriault <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> Civil servants forge ahead with open data strategy as feds dither >>>>> >>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/civil-servants-forge-ahead-with-open-data-strategy-as-feds-dither-114858879.html?viewAllComments=y >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Tracey P. Lauriault >>>>> 613-234-2805 >>>>> http://traceyplauriault.ca/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Twitter: @Acrosscanada >>>> Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ >>>> http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com >>>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans >>>> Skype: samvekemans >>>> IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) >>>> @Acrosscanadatrails >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tracey P. Lauriault >>> 613-234-2805 >>> http://traceyplauriault.ca/ >>> >> >> >> -- >> Twitter: @Acrosscanada >> Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ >> http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans >> Skype: samvekemans >> IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) >> @Acrosscanadatrails >> > > > -- > Twitter: @Acrosscanada > Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ > http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans > Skype: samvekemans > IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) > @Acrosscanadatrails > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:05:09 -0500 > From: Glen Newton <[hidden email]> > To: civicaccess discuss <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [CivicAccess-discuss] Civil servants forge ahead with > open data strategy as feds dither > Message-ID: > <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack > Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists > > When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to > an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the > subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread > you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less > attention. It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives > particularly difficult. > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Sam Vekemans > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi Tracey, >> Who is it that I need to contact where i can share what i have? >> >> >> >> I have taken the canvec national/provincial .gml files, and converted >> many of the national/provincial data layers, and converted it into >> commonly known .shp .osm .gpx .kml and garmin .img format. >> >> >> This produced work is freely available with unrestricted use. ?Is >> their a home for this? >> (I have been in direct contact with Natural Resources Canada, and they >> have assured me that they do not plan on making national/provincial >> .shp files of canvec data anytime soon) >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Sam >> >> On 2/2/11, Tracey P. Lauriault <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Civil servants forge ahead with open data strategy as feds dither >>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/civil-servants-forge-ahead-with-open-data-strategy-as-feds-dither-114858879.html?viewAllComments=y >>> >>> -- >>> Tracey P. Lauriault >>> 613-234-2805 >>> http://traceyplauriault.ca/ >>> >> >> >> -- >> Twitter: @Acrosscanada >> Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ >> http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans >> Skype: samvekemans >> IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) >> @Acrosscanadatrails >> _______________________________________________ >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >> > > > > -- > > - > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:46:40 -0800 > From: Sam Vekemans <[hidden email]> > To: civicaccess discuss <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [CivicAccess-discuss] Civil servants forge ahead with > open data strategy as feds dither > Message-ID: > <AANLkTimn=[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Oops, > Apologies to subscribers, > I should have just responded to Tracey off-list, as my discussion was an > aside and not really related to the topic directly. > Thanks for moderating :) > Sam > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Glen Newton <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack >> Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists >> >> When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to >> an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the >> subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread >> you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less >> attention. It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives >> particularly difficult. >> >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Sam Vekemans >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi Tracey, >>> Who is it that I need to contact where i can share what i have? >>> >>> >>> >>> I have taken the canvec national/provincial .gml files, and converted >>> many of the national/provincial data layers, and converted it into >>> commonly known .shp .osm .gpx .kml and garmin .img format. >>> >>> >>> This produced work is freely available with unrestricted use. Is >>> their a home for this? >>> (I have been in direct contact with Natural Resources Canada, and they >>> have assured me that they do not plan on making national/provincial >>> .shp files of canvec data anytime soon) >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sam >>> >>> On 2/2/11, Tracey P. Lauriault <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Civil servants forge ahead with open data strategy as feds dither >>>> >> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/civil-servants-forge-ahead-with-open-data-strategy-as-feds-dither-114858879.html?viewAllComments=y >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tracey P. Lauriault >>>> 613-234-2805 <tel:+16132342805> >>>> http://traceyplauriault.ca/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Twitter: @Acrosscanada >>> Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ >>> http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com >>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans >>> Skype: samvekemans >>> IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) >>> @Acrosscanadatrails >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> - >> _______________________________________________ >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://lists.pwd.ca/pipermail/civicaccess-discuss/attachments/20110202/825fefc7/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:59:26 -0500 > From: Glen Newton <[hidden email]> > To: civicaccess discuss <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [CivicAccess-discuss] Civil servants forge ahead with > open data strategy as feds dither > Message-ID: > <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Hi Sam, > > I was just suggesting a separate thread, as opposed to adding to Tracey's. > I think your posting was both relevant (to the list) and interesting. > > -Glen :-) > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Sam Vekemans > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Oops, >> Apologies?to subscribers, >> I should have just responded to Tracey off-list, as my?discussion?was an >> aside and not really related to the topic directly. >> Thanks for moderating :) >> Sam >> >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Glen Newton <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack >>> Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists >>> >>> When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to >>> an existing message, instead start a fresh email. ?Even if you change the >>> subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread >>> you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less >>> attention. ? It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives >>> particularly difficult. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Sam Vekemans >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Hi Tracey, >>>> Who is it that I need to contact where i can share what i have? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have taken the canvec national/provincial .gml files, and converted >>>> many of the national/provincial data layers, and converted it into >>>> commonly known .shp .osm .gpx .kml and garmin .img format. >>>> >>>> >>>> This produced work is freely available with unrestricted use. ?Is >>>> their a home for this? >>>> (I have been in direct contact with Natural Resources Canada, and they >>>> have assured me that they do not plan on making national/provincial >>>> .shp files of canvec data anytime soon) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sam >>>> >>>> On 2/2/11, Tracey P. Lauriault <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> Civil servants forge ahead with open data strategy as feds dither >>>>> >>>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/civil-servants-forge-ahead-with-open-data-strategy-as-feds-dither-114858879.html?viewAllComments=y >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Tracey P. Lauriault >>>>> 613-234-2805 >>>>> http://traceyplauriault.ca/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Twitter: @Acrosscanada >>>> Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ >>>> http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com >>>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans >>>> Skype: samvekemans >>>> IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) >>>> @Acrosscanadatrails >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> - >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >> > > > > -- > > - > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:51:03 -0500 > From: Glen Newton <[hidden email]> > To: civicaccess discuss <[hidden email]>, GOSLING > members in Ottawa <[hidden email]> > Subject: [CivicAccess-discuss] Permanent access to public records: > "Dutch archives sign agreement for digital shared services > organization" > Message-ID: > <AANLkTi=Q60qzY64xs+i1p2CGAmt7f=-n=[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > http://www.ncdd.nl/en/artikel.php?id=83 > "On June 15 [2010] a broad delegation of Dutch archives signed an > agreement to build a shared services organization for providing > permanent access to all Dutch digital public records. The signatories > of the agreement included the National Archives, the City Archives of > Rotterdam and Amsterdam, the union of archivists KVAN, the union of > archives BRAIN, the Regional Historic Centres, the Union of Provincial > Archive Inspectors and Digital Heritage Netherlands (DEN) (press > release in Dutch, with text of proposal). > > This is a breakthrough agreement as it unites archives at all > administrative levels: national, regional and local behind a joint > plan. However, funding to the amount of M?20 over a five-year period > is yet to be secured. Much will depend on the willingness of the Dutch > Cabinet which is presently being formed to seriously address the issue > of permanent access to public records." > > -Glen > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > End of CivicAccess-discuss Digest, Vol 43, Issue 3 > ************************************************** > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |