Posted by
Tracey P. Lauriault-2 on
Dec 14, 2005; 4:39am
URL: http://civicaccess.416.s1.nabble.com/change-of-password-invitees-tp90p95.html
Patrick Dinnen wrote:
>I would tend to keep Joe Murray, the fairvote.ca guy, on the list for
>a couple of reasons: he seems to have good contacts in political
>information in general and specifically asked to be included. Plus he
>comes recommended by Phillip Smith, who is usually a good judge of
>relevant people I think. However I'm not 100% fixed that he should be
>included, at least in the first wave, whatever people think.
>
>
sounds good.
>Patrick
>
>On 12/13/05, Michael Lenczner <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>>stephane - could you change the username and password to:
>>
>>civicaccess
>>and
>>libre
>>
>>I want to put some of the finishing touches on before we send out this
>>email. and that includes making the site less predominantly anglo.
>>
>>Re: invitees
>>
http://www.civicaccess.ca/wiki/Launch/PossibleCoFounders>>
>>1) i would be for removing the person from "fairvote.ca" because there
>>seems to be no connetion to open anything from their group. They seem
>>to be more concerned with having a directly numerically
>>representational gov so that the smaller provinces have less power. I
>>don't think adding it is a good idea - and I'm not sure what his group
>>would bring as input? Is this okay to remove - or am i not seeing
>>something?
>>
>>2) tracey - the names that you suggested - are they all people that
>>need to be at this stage as co-founders or are some of them people
>>that could join in once we have lauched? it's great that you have
>>some contacts outside of ontario and quebec.
>>
>>
not everyone is for co-founders many can join when launched. I will try
to keep the geodiversity folks in.
>>3) i erased a few names to try to trim it down. It is important to
>>remember that the invitees will suggest other names after we contact
>>them but before we launch. I don't think we should add all of them,
>>but there will probably be a few people that will be important to add
>>as co-founders - out of respect to the work that they already do in
>>the area. does that make sense?
>>
>>I'm working on the letter now. I'm going to keep all of tracey's
>>edits except one - i think.
>>
>>I also remembered to add to the letter that if they join the mailing
>>list they are not aggreeing to be co-founders. They can join us in
>>the discussion and then they can choose to be co-founders when we
>>launch after x-mas.
>>
>>right?
>>
>>i'll send the invite for a another review in the next hour.
>>
>>mike
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca>
>
>