Re: change of password + invitees

Posted by Patrick Dinnen on Dec 13, 2005; 7:36pm
URL: http://civicaccess.416.s1.nabble.com/change-of-password-invitees-tp90p92.html

I would tend to keep Joe Murray, the fairvote.ca guy, on the list for
a couple of reasons: he seems to have good contacts in political
information in general and specifically asked to be included. Plus he
comes recommended by Phillip Smith, who is usually a good judge of
relevant people I think. However I'm not 100% fixed that he should be
included, at least in the first wave, whatever people think.

Patrick

On 12/13/05, Michael Lenczner <[hidden email]> wrote:

> stephane - could you change the username and password to:
>
> civicaccess
> and
> libre
>
> I want to put some of the finishing touches on before we send out this
> email.  and that includes making the site less predominantly anglo.
>
> Re: invitees
> http://www.civicaccess.ca/wiki/Launch/PossibleCoFounders
>
> 1) i would be for removing the person from "fairvote.ca" because there
> seems to be no connetion to open anything from their group.  They seem
> to be more concerned with having a directly numerically
> representational gov so that the smaller provinces have less power.  I
> don't think adding it is a good idea - and I'm not sure what his group
> would bring as input?  Is this okay to remove - or am i not seeing
> something?
>
> 2) tracey - the names that you suggested - are they all people that
> need to be at this stage as co-founders or are some of them people
> that could join in once we have lauched?  it's great that you have
> some contacts outside of ontario and quebec.
>
> 3) i erased a few names to try to trim it down.  It is important to
> remember that the invitees will suggest other names after we contact
> them but before we launch.  I don't think we should add all of them,
> but there will probably be a few people that will be important to add
> as co-founders - out of respect to the work that they already do in
> the area.  does that make sense?
>
> I'm working on the letter now.  I'm going to keep all of tracey's
> edits except one - i think.
>
> I also remembered to add to the letter that if they join the mailing
> list they are not aggreeing to be co-founders.  They can join us in
> the discussion and then they can choose to be co-founders when we
> launch after x-mas.
>
> right?
>
> i'll send the invite for a another review in the next hour.
>
> mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
>