Posted by
Russell McOrmond-2 on
Feb 20, 2007; 6:50pm
URL: http://civicaccess.416.s1.nabble.com/Fwd-Postal-Codes-and-MP-ridings-tp910p918.html
Michael Lenczner wrote:
> I think we could improve upon the letter before it gets made live.
>
> I tried to merge Daniel's and Hugh's letter. It might have just
> resulted in a version worse than both - because Hugh's was a public
> call to action, and Daniel's was a specifc to send to an MP.
>
> But maybe someone else will step in and make it better?
>
>
http://civicaccess.ca/wiki/PostalCodes I believe the sample letter at
http://www.digital-copyright.ca/edid/letter5 has a benefit of being
focused as a letter from a constituent, and also discusses the issue of
accuracy which would be improved with public peer review.
The letter above seems to be intended to form a letter from an
organization, rather than an individual constituent. Both can be done,
as each has different advantages and disadvantages.
--
Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <
http://www.flora.ca/>
Please help us tell the Canadian Parliament to protect our property
rights as owners of Information Technology. Sign the petition!
http://www.digital-copyright.ca/petition/ict/ "The government, lobbied by legacy copyright holders and hardware
manufacturers, can pry my camcorder, computer, home theatre, or
portable media player from my cold dead hands!"