> As said by someone in a previous mail, I think it would be better to
> send the invitation all together
>
> Tracey P. Lauriault wrote:
>
>>Sounds Good!
>>Adjust the English one as you see fit.
>>
>>I will send to my gang as I spoke with them. But not all of them yet!
>>Cheers
>>Tracey
>>
>>Stephane Guidoin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Sorry for being absent during the last week but I'd a huge projet till
>>>last wednesday.
>>>
>>>I read the launch thing. I agree with most of it. I just think we are
>>>better not to say when we want to go "public". It may take a while to
>>>keep all those people (co-founders). Most of them may answer after many
>>>days or weeks. Then we'll have to discuss with them before going public.
>>>
>>>I can translate the invitation in french this week end.
>>>
>>>Now we should decide who sends to whom ? For example I have put my name
>>>after Corey from howd they vote (talk with him a little). It means that
>>>I will send the invitation to him. This way we can make sure no one is
>>>left behind.
>>>
>>>What about this monday to send the invitation ?
>>>
>>>Stéphane
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>>>
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>
>>>
http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>>
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>
>>
http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca>>
>>
>>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca>
>