Login  Register

Re: trying to finish up

Posted by Daniel Haran on Mar 26, 2006; 3:10pm
URL: http://civicaccess.416.s1.nabble.com/trying-to-finish-up-tp374p384.html

I've put up a mock up of the front page as I would see it.
http://www.civicaccess.ca/wiki/FrontPageMockup

Eventually, a front page could have just the first paragraph, with
news (+RSS feed) and *ways for people to get involved*. That last
point is probably the most important thing from my perspective. What
do we want this site to accomplish? A lot of decisions flow very
easily once that's clear.

Oh, and I made up a campaign. It's a devious ploy to get people
thinking about a census data campaign. (I think it's a great idea).

Disclaimers:
1- It's ugly. I never pretended to be a designer :)
2- The information is mostly based on our About page, but I've changed
important parts (e.g. removing the non-commercial objective. I think
data should be free, and I think that was the consensus on the list so
far)
3- I didn't translate the page, as I think these should be separate
English/French pages as mentioned earlier. I can translate if/once it
has consensus.

Cheers,

Daniel.

On 3/26/06, Michael Lenczner <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm worried that it's going to alienate lots of potential quebec
> participants.  Dèja le plupart de la site est en Anglais ansi que les
> titres des pages.  Aussi, le mailing list ca se passe presque seulment
> en Anglais.  Je ne pense pas que on a besoin de leur donner un autre
> raison à croire que le site n'est pas crèer pour eux.
>
> also - instead of COACID can we use Civic Access / Accès Civique?
> Both for the title and in the text?  I changed the corresponding text
> in the wiki (on the front page).
>
> In general, we probably should never use COACID or the french version,
> CALIDC.  Just CivicAccess.ca or AccesCivique.ca
>
>
> On 3/26/06, Patrick Dinnen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On the maple leaf, I'm not a flag waving sort myself either. But the
> > thinking here was that without some indicator it's not at all apparent
> > that the group/site relates to Canadian data specifically. The leaf
> > seemed like a super quick and clear way of communicating that visually.
> >
> > Personally I'm much more bothered by the use of the term 'Splash page'
> > than I am about using the flag ;-) But whatever people think.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > Michael Lenczner wrote:
> > > looks good.
> > >
> > > I would skip the maple leave, though.  seems . . . gratuitous, to a
> > > quebecer at least.  and it kinda looks like we might be "official",
> > > gov't funded or something.
> > >
> > > On 3/26/06, Tracey P. Lauriault <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>  :-)
> > >>
> > >>  someday someone will have to explain to be the politics of the s word!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  Patrick Dinnen wrote:
> > >>  I agree that an initial page to explain a little about what the site/a
> > >> wiki is would be helpful (lets say landing page, rather than using the S
> > >> word with it's information-free connotations). Here's a 10 minute design
> > >> on how that might look:
> > >> http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=118104671&size=o
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Patrick
> > >>
> > >> Michael Lenczner wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  I know tracey just added some more sections to the site.
> > >>
> > >> on my side:
> > >>
> > >> 1) i think we should keep a splash page before the wiki. that way we
> > >> can at some point set up another cms if we want to.
> > >>
> > >> if we don't keep a splash page then people will link to
> > >> http://www.civicaccess.ca to go to the wiki. To put a blog in before
> > >> that a year later would mean breaking everyone's links to the wiki.
> > >>
> > >> so we should prevent http://www.civicaccess.ca from forwarding
> > >> automatically to the wiki.
> > >>
> > >> and 2) we should keep a splash page because many of the people who we
> > >> want to become participants of civicaccess have never seen a wiki
> > >> before and will be kinda shocked with how unprofessional it seems.
> > >> especially because it seems that we're going to have to "go live"
> > >> before we get a nicely organized wiki with lots of content.
> > >>
> > >> Steph - can you put a back a temporary splash page? and maybe you or
> > >> patrick or someone else can do a lightly designed splash page explain
> > >> civicaccess in french + english (link to suggested text below) with a
> > >> link to the wiki?
> > >>
> > >> http://www.civicaccess.ca/wiki/Launch/SplashPage (suggested
> > >> text)
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> > >> [hidden email]
> > >> http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  _______________________________________________
> > >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> > >> [hidden email]
> > >> http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> > >> [hidden email]
> > >> http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
>