Login  Register

Re: Getting Tools Built

Posted by Tracey P. Lauriault on Jul 09, 2008; 2:23pm
URL: http://civicaccess.416.s1.nabble.com/capitol-words-tp1130p1145.html

Hey gang!

I like that we are a loose group sharing info, discussing, with clusters of people working together when needed/wanted, writing together, co-authoring blogs, and building things. It is also really nice that we take the time to meet face to face from time to time just to get to know each other more.

- non-profit or a more formalized organizational form, it is possible, however, i am not sure now is the time.  It is also really nice that people who are off doing their org work can come here to discuss what is up, tap into knowledge etc.

- competition or other similar/related projects on the go, that is just good.  It helps create a heterogeneous and more robust information ecology around the topic of civic access.

- as for data, I am for all data not just scientific, its just that I have a penchant for that type of data because of my work, and we took great pains to ensure at the beginning to ensure that we include information (e.g. government reports, meeting minutes, foi requests, etc.), and the development of tools to make that access better, easier, aesthetically pleasing, etc. 

- financial resources are required for projects, we can certainly find interesting ways to have another org that has an established financial infrastructure and organization in place to help out or perhaps a group of people from here work together to get something off the ground.

- Lobbying/advocacy work is also an important part of all of this, and so far a few things have been done and it would be good to work on that a bit more.

- city sondage, i am up for that.  I am working with a bunch of cities right now and would love for them to make their data available.  If people want to work on that again, I am most certainly interested as it would provide us with real fodder for a debate. 

- CivicAccess.ca right now has librarians, archivists, hacktivists, geeks, social data enthusiasts, open government, social policy, writers, new media folks, scientific data and open access folks.  They are each unique communities and some meet at conferences, some will go to barcamps, others go for dinner.  At some point it would be fantastic to find a forum that is not community specific that can get these groups together.

- we have also been tagging stuff in delicious & flickr with COACID and civicaccess, and it would be great if we continued to do that as that will just make access to pooled resources richer.

Cheers
t





On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Jennifer Bell <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks, Micheal, you bring up some good points re: the fact that there ought to be competition.

As for example sites, there's a couple on the go at VisibleGovernment as well.  The idea was to shepherd these ones through the planning process and use them, as well as howdtheyvote and theyworkforyou as examples for raising money.  I've been getting some input from  end users in advocacy groups, but the project groups definitely could use more input - particularly from people with technical backgrounds (hint, hint).

The two pilots are:

 - an expense database that allows advocacy groups and journalists to visualize / tag / screen hospitality and expense data.

 - an access to information front end, modeled on WhatDoTheyKnow from the UK

There's more information in the groups linked from the project pages here:
http://visiblegovernment.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=4&Itemid=28

Please take a look and see if you feel like getting involved.

Jennifer

--- On Tue, 7/8/08, Michael Lenczner <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: Michael Lenczner <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [CivicAccess-discuss] Getting Tools Built
> To: [hidden email], "civicaccess discuss" <[hidden email]>
> Received: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 12:04 PM
> Hello,
>
> It's great that you're pushing this conversation,
> Jennifer.
>
> My thoughts about making this happen in Canada to a larger
> degree is
> that we need more people like yourself:
>
> -understand technology / aren't afraid of it.
> -have an understanding of business / financing.
> -are committed to making something happen.
>
> I think that's what we're missing, not a specific
> form of organizing.
> Personally I don't like the idea of either CivicAccess
> or your project
> being the one-stop-shop for all of this work.  I believe in
> an
> approach of diversity and competition in the open-source
> space.
>
> More than processes and structures that look good on paper,
> I think we
> need some more concrete examples of working projects as
> well as people
> who have 1, 2, 3 + citizen information projects under their
> belt.  In
> the past I've offered to help howdtheyvote raise some
> funds because
> the experience and commitment is already visible.
> Currently I'm just
> finishing a demo of something I want to see built and will
> try to go
> fundraise for it.
>
> That being said, I agree with your and Cory's point
> that there is a
> natural point of friction for geeks that want to build
> projects but
> don't want to bother with legal status for each or
> don't have the
> skillset to do fundraising. I think that there's great
> work to do
> there.  But first, i think we need some more actual
> projects that are
> funded by either individual donors or by foundations.  That
> will
> establish the movement as more credible.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Jennifer Bell
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've been thinking the last while about the best
> approach for promoting the creation of online tools for
> government transparency.  The Sunlight Foundation in the US
> and mySociety in the UK are showing that the government can
> be changed by example, from the outside.  It just takes
> people to push to make it happen.
> >
> > What will it take to get a similar movement going here
> in Canada?  As I know there are several people here with
> experience in similar groups, I'd like to get your
> opinions.
> >
> > The ingredients, as I see them, are:
> >
> > 1) Money.
> >
> > The Sunlight Foundation initially had a single large
> donor, who put up a seed of 3.5M.
> >
> > 2) A Community.
> >
> > barcamps are a great example of people coming together
> to learn and share. E-gov sessions can be tagged on to
> existing barcamps, and dedicated events held once
> there's some interest.
> >
> > Possibly, these could be supplemented with
> invitation-only events for a more 'elite' crowd of
> government and high-tech representatives.
> >
> > 3) A Tool.
> >
> > There ought to be a website to formally capture ideas
> for tools and allow them to be developed by the community.
> There's a rough plan for one here, which I'd like
> feedback on:
> >
> >
> http://groups.google.com/group/visiblegovernment-discuss/browse_thread/thread/9b0211b0b51965df?hl=en
> >
> > ....
> >
> > I would appreciate any input.
> >
> > At a recent conference, the moderator started out by
> saying 'I believe in the wisdom of crowds, and I
> believe we have a very wise crowd here today'.
> >
> > Jennifer
> > visiblegovernment.ca
> >
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the
> web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now at
> > http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> >
> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
> >


     __________________________________________________________________
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss



--
Tracey P. Lauriault

[hidden email]
https://gcrc.carleton.ca/confluence/display/GCRCWEB/Lauriault