Slashdot: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/04/09/0444221/The-Economist-Weighs-In-For-Shorter-Copyright-Terms
"The Economist says that long copyright terms are hindering creativity, and that shortening them is the way to go: 'Largely thanks to the entertainment industry's lawyers and lobbyists, copyright's scope and duration have vastly increased. In America, copyright holders get 95 years' protection as a result of an extension granted in 1998, derided by critics as the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act." They are now calling for even greater protection, and there have been efforts to introduce similar terms in Europe. Such arguments should be resisted: it is time to tip the balance back.'" Original article: http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15868004 Word/Phrase of the Day: "Intellectual Monopoly" http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm -Glen http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ -- - |
Hi Glen,
Thanks for this! It actually presents a summarized version of a scholarly article published a few years ago by Landes and Posner, see here for the link: http://www.culturelibre.ca/2010/03/02/droit-dauteur-renouvelable-a-linfini/ My thinking is that Landes & Posner make a compelling argument about the economic value of a work over time. A shorter term of copyright, with the possibility renewing makes sense. It would fit with the trend of registering your works with copyright collectives to commercialize. The current model of lobbying for a longer term and eventually using trade mark laws (this option not many people talk about, Mickey Mouse and Tintin are also trade marks and publishing is a commercial process...) to limit using older works poses great risk for many stakeholders in the debate. Or at least, that's as much as I'll say in an email :) Cheers, Olivier Charbonneau, BCom, LLM Associate Librarian, Concordia University Doctoral candidate in Law, Université de Montréal www.culturelibre.ca On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:20:09 -0400, Glen Newton <[hidden email]> wrote: > Slashdot: > http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/04/09/0444221/The-Economist-Weighs-In-For-Shorter-Copyright-Terms > "The Economist says that long copyright terms are hindering > creativity, and that shortening them is the way to go: 'Largely thanks > to the entertainment industry's lawyers and lobbyists, copyright's > scope and duration have vastly increased. In America, copyright > holders get 95 years' protection as a result of an extension granted > in 1998, derided by critics as the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act." They > are now calling for even greater protection, and there have been > efforts to introduce similar terms in Europe. Such arguments should be > resisted: it is time to tip the balance back.'" > > Original article: > http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15868004 > > Word/Phrase of the Day: "Intellectual Monopoly" > http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm > > > -Glen > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |