Re: CivicAccess-discuss Digest, Vol 50, Issue 18

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: CivicAccess-discuss Digest, Vol 50, Issue 18

Tracey P. Lauriault
I believe ottawa and the other open data cities will adopt the BC licence - http://www.data.gov.bc.ca/dbc/admin/terms.page?

I understand this is the best to date which is a copy of the UK licence.

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:00 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Send CivicAccess-discuss mailing list submissions to
       [hidden email]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       [hidden email]

You can reach the person managing the list at
       [hidden email]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CivicAccess-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Share-Alike (St?phane Guidoin)
  2. Re: Share-Alike (Karl Dubost)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:58:11 -0400
From: St?phane Guidoin <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [CivicAccess-discuss] Share-Alike
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"

Yes Kent, and that's basically what we asked to the officials: why not?
And the answer is largely "because the others are doing it" plus some
other unclear arguments.

That's the kind of argument that is difficult to circumvent. It means we
are in a domain where nobody is really sure of what to add, and then we
do as others...

Steph

Le 11-09-17 08:38, Kent Mewhort a ?crit :
> I think the most powerful argument against SA is to turn the question
> back around.  If there's no strong justification for putting a
> restriction into a license, why do it?.
>
> Every further restriction you put into a license reduces the ways that
> a person can use and re-use content, restricting many uses that you
> might not even envision at the time of licensing.
>
> Kent
>
> ------------------------------
> Kent Mewhort ([hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>)
> http://www.openissues.ca
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Nicolas Roberge
> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi, I'm with Capitale Ouverte a new group targeting Quebec City.
>
>     I think Shake-Alike will be impossible to enforce. If they try to do
>     so, they'll have to invest a lot of labour (money) into policing the
>     web. It's a waste of taxpayer's money.
>
>     Also it will scare off any serious company into investing in software
>     development based on their data. It increases the legal complexity and
>     therefor increases the business risk of commercializing the app. They
>     won't have the same ROI than with a simpler license.
>
>     --
>     Nicolas Roberge
>     Ovologic Inc.
>     [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>     T?l.: <a href="tel:418%20573-7879" value="+14185737879">418 573-7879 <tel:418%20573-7879>
>     Skype: nroberge
>
>     Vous voulez qu'on se rencontre? Visitez
>     http://tungle.me/nicolasroberge
>     _______________________________________________
>     CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>     [hidden email]
>     <mailto:[hidden email]>
>     http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pwd.ca/pipermail/civicaccess-discuss/attachments/20110917/0e15275c/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:34:18 -0400
From: Karl Dubost <[hidden email]>
To: civicaccess discuss <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [CivicAccess-discuss] Share-Alike
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252


Le 16 sept. 2011 ? 18:13, john whelan a ?crit :
> What has Ottawa ended up with on Open data?  My understanding is it has some sort of licence.  I'm interested as I have a use for some of the data.


I might be worth to add data here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Data_in_Canada
Maybe creating a table

City Name | License | Portal | ? etc.

What are the other categories?

--
Karl Dubost
Montr?al, QC, Canada
http://www.la-grange.net/karl/



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss

End of CivicAccess-discuss Digest, Vol 50, Issue 18
***************************************************