Have any of you see of heard this? Were you aware there was a tender for this? Cheers t
-- _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
It was on the list on the 11th: http://civicaccess.48776.x6.nabble.com/Fwd-OpenDataBC-Budget-Contains-Funding-for-Open-Data-td6535.html
I don't think it was a tender. It seems to be an OpenText-led initiative. It's news to the people I know at the University of Waterloo. On 2014-02-14, at 12:26 PM, Tracey P. Lauriault wrote:
_______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
Seems like a big chunk sole source thing then! On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:38 PM, James McKinney <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
I (and I am sure others) am glad whenever there is an Open Data
initiative happening but it distressing to see it happening " fait
accompli" without engagement.
On 14/02/2014 11:07 AM, Tracey P.
Lauriault wrote:
_______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
I assume engagement will be among the first things the new ODI will do (if it passes, which I'm assuming it will)? The UK ODI was the result of four years of negotiating with the UK government. Once they secured the funding, they engaged with the community to be as productive/effective as possible.
I'm also not sure if setting up an institute like this is really the kind of thing that goes to tender. On 2014-02-14, at 1:57 PM, Gerry Tychon wrote:
_______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
James, 3 mil is alot of mulah to just give away, this is like a big sole source allotment of cash, normally one applies for that and you allow for the best group, or individuals compete and with a well laid plan. while I expect and hope it will be good, it should have been a more open process.
On Friday, February 14, 2014, James McKinney <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |