"Sydney Opera House to devs: build our app for peanuts, wear patent pain"
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/18/sydney_opera_house_to_devs_build_our_app_for_free_wear_patent_pain/ 1 - Clause k: “that, by submitting your Entry in this Hackathon, you warrant that your Entry is your original work which does not infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party and assign, on creation, any intellectual property rights in the Entry to the Sydney Opera House Trust and agree to sign any necessary documentation that may be required for us and our designees to make use of the rights you granted.” 2 - “in the event you breach the warranty set out in paragraph k) above, you indemnify the Sydney Opera House Trust, its officers, employees, contractors and agents against any and all claims that your Entry infringes on the intellectual property rights of any third party.” 3 - “By entering this Hackathon, you agree that use of information in our representatives’ unaided memories in the development or deployment of our products or services does not create liability for us” Wow. Basing future liability on someone else's memory _in_a_contract_? -Glen _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
Once you allow information or mental processes to be patentable, all sorts of nonsense results.. The fault lies with the politicians who haven't clearly fixed this bug in the law (and put the offensive proponents in their proper place in society), not the Opera house trying to protect themselves from broken law. Let's please direct our well founded disgust to the proper malfeasants. On Nov 19, 2013 1:07 PM, "Glen Newton" <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Sydney Opera House to devs: build our app for peanuts, wear patent pain" _______________________________________________ CivicAccess-discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |