Fwd: Survey on the OGP Independent Reporting Mechanism

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: Survey on the OGP Independent Reporting Mechanism

Tracey P. Lauriault
FYI

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: paul maassen <[hidden email]>
Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:27 AM
Subject: Survey on the OGP Independent Reporting Mechanism
To:


Dear all,

The number of responses to our request for input into the IRM discussion that the Standards and Criteria sub-committee will have next week has been very high. Over 70 of you have indicated interest to fill in the survey. And it looks like a nice mix across continents and specialities.

Here is the link:

Please fill in the survey (16 questions, mostly multiple choice) before Sunday May 23 end of your dayJuan Pardinas (IMCO), Martin Tisne (Omidyar Network), Suneeta Kaimal (Revenue Watch Institute) and Warren Krafchik (IBP, co chair Steering Committee) will take the survey results on board while preparing for the meeting at the end of next week.

To avoid misunderstandings: the four people mentioned above are the only ones attending the actual meeting of the Standards and Criteria sub-committee in London on 24/25 May. No need to board a plane (-:

Thanks in advance for your replies and suggestions!

Best



Paul

OGP Civil Society Coordinator 

P.s. With almost a 100 replies, many send to the list, the invite for input filled up quite some mailboxes. Let's agree that we only 'reply to all' or to [hidden email] if the content of the message is actually important to all. 



--
Tracey P. Lauriault
613-234-2805
 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Survey on the OGP Independent Reporting Mechanism

James McKinney-2
Would there be interest in sharing/discussing answers to the survey? The first page of questions are the most strategically interesting.

On 2012-05-17, at 10:25 AM, Tracey P. Lauriault wrote:

FYI

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: paul maassen <[hidden email]>
Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:27 AM
Subject: Survey on the OGP Independent Reporting Mechanism
To:


Dear all,

The number of responses to our request for input into the IRM discussion that the Standards and Criteria sub-committee will have next week has been very high. Over 70 of you have indicated interest to fill in the survey. And it looks like a nice mix across continents and specialities.

Here is the link:

Please fill in the survey (16 questions, mostly multiple choice) before Sunday May 23 end of your dayJuan Pardinas (IMCO), Martin Tisne (Omidyar Network), Suneeta Kaimal (Revenue Watch Institute) and Warren Krafchik (IBP, co chair Steering Committee) will take the survey results on board while preparing for the meeting at the end of next week.

To avoid misunderstandings: the four people mentioned above are the only ones attending the actual meeting of the Standards and Criteria sub-committee in London on 24/25 May. No need to board a plane (-:

Thanks in advance for your replies and suggestions!

Best



Paul

OGP Civil Society Coordinator 

P.s. With almost a 100 replies, many send to the list, the invite for input filled up quite some mailboxes. Let's agree that we only 'reply to all' or to [hidden email] if the content of the message is actually important to all. 



--
Tracey P. Lauriault
613-234-2805
 

_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Survey on the OGP Independent Reporting Mechanism

Tracey P. Lauriault
Sure! I have not looked at it.  I will look at it on Sat.

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, James McKinney <[hidden email]> wrote:
Would there be interest in sharing/discussing answers to the survey? The first page of questions are the most strategically interesting.

On 2012-05-17, at 10:25 AM, Tracey P. Lauriault wrote:

FYI

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: paul maassen <[hidden email]>
Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:27 AM
Subject: Survey on the OGP Independent Reporting Mechanism
To:


Dear all,

The number of responses to our request for input into the IRM discussion that the Standards and Criteria sub-committee will have next week has been very high. Over 70 of you have indicated interest to fill in the survey. And it looks like a nice mix across continents and specialities.

Here is the link:

Please fill in the survey (16 questions, mostly multiple choice) before Sunday May 23 end of your dayJuan Pardinas (IMCO), Martin Tisne (Omidyar Network), Suneeta Kaimal (Revenue Watch Institute) and Warren Krafchik (IBP, co chair Steering Committee) will take the survey results on board while preparing for the meeting at the end of next week.

To avoid misunderstandings: the four people mentioned above are the only ones attending the actual meeting of the Standards and Criteria sub-committee in London on 24/25 May. No need to board a plane (-:

Thanks in advance for your replies and suggestions!

Best



Paul

OGP Civil Society Coordinator 

P.s. With almost a 100 replies, many send to the list, the invite for input filled up quite some mailboxes. Let's agree that we only 'reply to all' or to [hidden email] if the content of the message is actually important to all. 



--
Tracey P. Lauriault
<a href="tel:613-234-2805" value="+16132342805" target="_blank">613-234-2805
 

_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss


_______________________________________________
CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss



--
Tracey P. Lauriault
613-234-2805