Democracy Watch
http://dwatch.ca/camp/RelsDec0511.html CBC news Canada gets moving on Open Government http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2011/12/-governments-treasure-the-values.html |
I wish someone from democracy watch had talked to this list first. I'm
not 100% confident but I don't know that the plans had to be shared at this meeting. There is another meeting in brazil in April where I believe they do have to be shared. On 2011-12-11, at 10:23 AM, "Tracey P. Lauriault" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Democracy Watch > http://dwatch.ca/camp/RelsDec0511.html > > CBC news > > Canada gets moving on Open Government > http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2011/12/-governments-treasure-the-values.html > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
The draft is supposed to be presented at the Dec 2011 meeting and the final document is supposed to be delivered in March 2012.
I think their point is that the government was supposed to undertake broad public consultation soon after they expressed their intent to join OGP. Which, as far as I know, did not happen.
See point 1 here: http://www.opengovpartnership.org/new-country-guidance
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, David Eaves <[hidden email]> wrote: I wish someone from democracy watch had talked to this list first. I'm Herb Lainchbury Dynamic Solutions Inc. www.dynamic-solutions.com http://twitter.com/herblainchbury |
Yes, there is nothing in that document that says you must have done your consultation. It says come prepared to share, but it is not required. The deadline is the next meeting. I don't mind holding the governments feet to the fire, but to preserve credibility Of being a critic it is essential to be accurate. Accusing the government of failing on its commitments is a serious charge. I'm happy to say they should have done the consultation by now, but claiming they have failed the agreement is incorrect. I want to ensure that we advocates have maximum credibility.
|
Can you share the links of the documents you are refering to?
Cheers t On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, David Eaves <[hidden email]> wrote: > Yes, there is nothing in that document that says you must have done your > consultation. It says come prepared to share, but it is not required. The > deadline is the next meeting. I don't mind holding the governments feet to > the fire, but to preserve credibility Of being a critic it is essential to > be accurate. Accusing the government of failing on its commitments is a > serious charge. I'm happy to say they should have done the consultation by > now, but claiming they have failed the agreement is incorrect. I want to > ensure that we advocates have maximum credibility. > > > > -- > www.eaves.ca > @daeaves > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2011-12-11, at 11:18 AM, Herb Lainchbury <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > The draft is supposed to be presented at the Dec 2011 meeting and the final > document is supposed to be delivered in March 2012. > > I think their point is that the government was supposed to undertake broad > public consultation soon after they expressed their intent to join OGP. > Which, as far as I know, did not happen. > > See point 1 here: http://www.opengovpartnership.org/new-country-guidance > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, David Eaves <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> I wish someone from democracy watch had talked to this list first. I'm >> not 100% confident but I don't know that the plans had to be shared at >> this meeting. There is another meeting in brazil in April where I >> believe they do have to be shared. >> >> On 2011-12-11, at 10:23 AM, "Tracey P. Lauriault" <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> > Democracy Watch >> > http://dwatch.ca/camp/RelsDec0511.html >> > >> > CBC news >> > >> > Canada gets moving on Open Government >> > >> > http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2011/12/-governments-treasure-the-values.html >> > _______________________________________________ >> > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > > > > -- > Herb Lainchbury > Dynamic Solutions Inc. > www.dynamic-solutions.com > http://twitter.com/herblainchbury > > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
I believe David was referring to the link included in my previous note. http://www. opengovpartnership.org/new-country-guidance H On Dec 11, 2011 1:48 PM, "Tracey P. Lauriault" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Can you share the links of the documents you are refering to? |
In reply to this post by Tracey P. Lauriault
Herb linked to them in his comments.
|
Thanks & sorry for the repeat!
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, David Eaves <[hidden email]> wrote: > Herb linked to them in his comments. > > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/new-country-guidance > > > -- > www.eaves.ca > @daeaves > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2011-12-11, at 1:48 PM, "Tracey P. Lauriault" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Can you share the links of the documents you are refering to? > > Cheers > t > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, David Eaves <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Yes, there is nothing in that document that says you must have done your > > consultation. It says come prepared to share, but it is not required. The > > deadline is the next meeting. I don't mind holding the governments feet to > > the fire, but to preserve credibility Of being a critic it is essential to > > be accurate. Accusing the government of failing on its commitments is a > > serious charge. I'm happy to say they should have done the consultation by > > now, but claiming they have failed the agreement is incorrect. I want to > > ensure that we advocates have maximum credibility. > > > > > -- > > www.eaves.ca > > @daeaves > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 2011-12-11, at 11:18 AM, Herb Lainchbury <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > The draft is supposed to be presented at the Dec 2011 meeting and the final > > document is supposed to be delivered in March 2012. > > > I think their point is that the government was supposed to undertake broad > > public consultation soon after they expressed their intent to join OGP. > > Which, as far as I know, did not happen. > > > See point 1 here: http://www.opengovpartnership.org/new-country-guidance > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, David Eaves <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > I wish someone from democracy watch had talked to this list first. I'm > > not 100% confident but I don't know that the plans had to be shared at > > this meeting. There is another meeting in brazil in April where I > > believe they do have to be shared. > > > On 2011-12-11, at 10:23 AM, "Tracey P. Lauriault" <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > Democracy Watch > > http://dwatch.ca/camp/RelsDec0511.html > > > CBC news > > > Canada gets moving on Open Government > > > http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2011/12/-governments-treasure-the-values.html > > _______________________________________________ > > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > > > > > -- > > Herb Lainchbury > > Dynamic Solutions Inc. > > www.dynamic-solutions.com > > http://twitter.com/herblainchbury > > > _______________________________________________ > > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > CivicAccess-discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |